High Medieval

Click here to see how to contribute

7. HIGH MEDIEVAL (1066–1485): RESEARCH AGENDA

Click here to see the recommended strategic objectives for this period.

7.1 Urbanism

7.1.1: How did the major towns and smaller market towns of the region develop after the Norman Conquest, both within the urban core and in suburban and extra-mural areas?

More information on this question
URI:
https://researchframeworks.org/emherf/researchframework/v1/question/question-5de0177943db7
Linked Strategy(s):
7G – Estates, architecture and power: investigate the relationship between castles and great houses and their estates
More information:
Status:
Active
Authority to change status:
East Midlands Research Framework Steering Group
Date accepted:
Date of next review:

7.1.2: Can we define more closely the industrial and trading activities associated with towns and the nature and extent of urban influence upon the countryside?

More information on this question
URI:
https://researchframeworks.org/emherf/researchframework/v1/question/question-5de017794512f
Linked Strategy(s):
7J – Research the regional communications infrastructure
More information:
Status:
Active
Authority to change status:
East Midlands Research Framework Steering Group
Date accepted:
Date of next review:

7.1.3: How may we enhance our understanding of the chronology, functions and morphology of caves, and in particular the outstanding subterranean resource of medieval Nottingham?

More information on this question
URI:
https://researchframeworks.org/emherf/researchframework/v1/question/question-5de01779461aa
Linked Strategy(s):
7B – Enhance the record of urban and suburban secular standing buildings and associated subterranean structures
More information:
Status:
Active
Authority to change status:
East Midlands Research Framework Steering Group
Date accepted:
Date of next review:

7.1.4: Can we shed further light upon the commercial role of fairs, markets, ports and other trading centres (notably Boston)?

More information on this question
URI:
https://researchframeworks.org/emherf/researchframework/v1/question/question-5de0177946a18
Linked Strategy(s):
7J – Research the regional communications infrastructure
More information:
Status:
Active
Authority to change status:
East Midlands Research Framework Steering Group
Date accepted:
Date of next review:

7.2 Rural settlement

7.2.1: How can we elucidate further the development of nucleated villages, and in particular the contribution of the Danelaw to changes in village morphology?

More information on this question
URI:
https://researchframeworks.org/emherf/researchframework/v1/question/question-5de0177947395
Linked Strategy(s):
7I – Investigate the development of the open-field system and medieval woodland management
More information:
Status:
Active
Authority to change status:
East Midlands Research Framework Steering Group
Date accepted:
Date of next review:

7.2.2: How can we shed further light upon the origin and development of dispersed hamlets and farms in champion and pastoral areas?

More information on this question
URI:
https://researchframeworks.org/emherf/researchframework/v1/question/question-5de0177947b9b
Linked Strategy(s):
7I – Investigate the development of the open-field system and medieval woodland management
More information:
Status:
Active
Authority to change status:
East Midlands Research Framework Steering Group
Date accepted:
Date of next review:

7.2.3: How can we improve our understanding of the form, evolution and functions of buildings within rural settlements and establish the extent of surviving medieval fabrics?

More information on this question
URI:
https://researchframeworks.org/emherf/researchframework/v1/question/question-5de01779483f1
Linked Strategy(s):
7E – Investigate the morphology of rural settlements
More information:
Status:
Active
Authority to change status:
East Midlands Research Framework Steering Group
Date accepted:
Date of next review:

7.2.4: Can we clarify further the processes of settlement desertion and shrinkage, especially within zones of dispersed settlement?

More information on this question
URI:
https://researchframeworks.org/emherf/researchframework/v1/question/question-5de0177948b4a
Linked Strategy(s):
7F – Investigate the development, structure and landholdings of manorial estate centres
More information:
Status:
Active
Authority to change status:
East Midlands Research Framework Steering Group
Date accepted:
Date of next review:

7.3 Manors and manorial estates

7.3.1: How can the classification of moated and non-moated manorial sites be improved?

More information on this question
URI:
https://researchframeworks.org/emherf/researchframework/v1/question/question-5de01779492ab
Linked Strategy(s):
7F – Investigate the development, structure and landholdings of manorial estate centres
More information:
Status:
Active
Authority to change status:
East Midlands Research Framework Steering Group
Date accepted:
Date of next review:

7.3.2: How did the medieval manor and manorial estates develop from the Anglo-Saxon period, and what was the impact of the Danelaw?

More information on this question
URI:
https://researchframeworks.org/emherf/researchframework/v1/question/question-5de0177949a2e
Linked Strategy(s):
7I – Investigate the development of the open-field system and medieval woodland management
More information:
Status:
Active
Authority to change status:
East Midlands Research Framework Steering Group
Date accepted:
Date of next review:

7.3.3: Can we improve our knowledge and classification of moated sites in the region, and how can environmental data add to our knowledge?

More information on this question
URI:
https://researchframeworks.org/emherf/researchframework/v1/question/question-5de017794a1b0
Linked Strategy(s):
7F – Investigate the development, structure and landholdings of manorial estate centres
More information:
Status:
Active
Authority to change status:
East Midlands Research Framework Steering Group
Date accepted:
Date of next review:

7.3.4: What standing buildings are present on moated sites and what functions may associated features found during survey have performed?

More information on this question
URI:
https://researchframeworks.org/emherf/researchframework/v1/question/question-5de017794a922
Linked Strategy(s):
7F – Investigate the development, structure and landholdings of manorial estate centres
More information:
Status:
Active
Authority to change status:
East Midlands Research Framework Steering Group
Date accepted:
Date of next review:

7.3.5: How did manor buildings develop over time, how may architectural styles have varied, and what can we learn about traditional constructional skills and designs?

More information on this question
URI:
https://researchframeworks.org/emherf/researchframework/v1/question/question-5de017794b04b
Linked Strategy(s):
7G – Estates, architecture and power: investigate the relationship between castles and great houses and their estates
More information:
Status:
Active
Authority to change status:
East Midlands Research Framework Steering Group
Date accepted:
Date of next review:

7.4 Castles, military sites and country houses

7.4.1: How can studies of the region’s buildings contribute to an understanding of castle origins, and can we identify local typologies of castles and country houses?

More information on this question
URI:
https://researchframeworks.org/emherf/researchframework/v1/question/question-5de017794b6b5
Linked Strategy(s):
7G – Estates, architecture and power: investigate the relationship between castles and great houses and their estates
More information:
Status:
Active
Authority to change status:
East Midlands Research Framework Steering Group
Date accepted:
Date of next review:

7.4.2: What was the date and function of currently undated minor motte and bailey castles?

More information on this question
URI:
https://researchframeworks.org/emherf/researchframework/v1/question/question-5de017794bedc
More information:
Status:
Active
Authority to change status:
East Midlands Research Framework Steering Group
Date accepted:
Date of next review:

7.4.3: How many castle sites have been lost within the region?

More information on this question
URI:
https://researchframeworks.org/emherf/researchframework/v1/question/question-5de017794c589
More information:
Status:
Active
Authority to change status:
East Midlands Research Framework Steering Group
Date accepted:
Date of next review:

7.4.4: Was there continuity of location between castles and country houses, and are earlier structures concealed in later buildings?

More information on this question
URI:
https://researchframeworks.org/emherf/researchframework/v1/question/question-5de017794cd4b
Linked Strategy(s):
7A – Undertake syntheses of urban excavation, survey and documentary data to develop understanding of town development
More information:
Status:
Active
Authority to change status:
East Midlands Research Framework Steering Group
Date accepted:
Date of next review:

7.4.5: What local resources were used for building and maintenance and what was the environmental context and economic impact of these buildings?

More information on this question
URI:
https://researchframeworks.org/emherf/researchframework/v1/question/question-5de017794d4c8
Linked Strategy(s):
7G – Estates, architecture and power: investigate the relationship between castles and great houses and their estates
More information:
Status:
Active
Authority to change status:
East Midlands Research Framework Steering Group
Date accepted:
Date of next review:

7.4.6: How should battlefield sites be further investigated?

More information on this question
URI:
https://researchframeworks.org/emherf/researchframework/v1/question/question-5de017794dbe3
Linked Strategy(s):
7H – Investigate the location and character of medieval battlefields
More information:
Status:
Active
Authority to change status:
East Midlands Research Framework Steering Group
Date accepted:
Date of next review:

7.5 Religion

7.5.1: Can we identify additional pre-Conquest church, minster and monastic sites and elucidate the development of later monastic settlement (particularly the regionally important Gilbertine and Templar orders)?

More information on this question
URI:
https://researchframeworks.org/emherf/researchframework/v1/question/question-5de017794e54f
More information:
Status:
Active
Authority to change status:
East Midlands Research Framework Steering Group
Date accepted:
Date of next review:

7.5.2: Can we discern significant differences in the planning, economy and landscape impact of the different monastic orders (e.g. Witham Valley)?

More information on this question
URI:
https://researchframeworks.org/emherf/researchframework/v1/question/question-5de017794ed26
More information:
Status:
Active
Authority to change status:
East Midlands Research Framework Steering Group
Date accepted:
Date of next review:

7.5.3: Can we elucidate further the development of hospitals and colleges?

More information on this question
URI:
https://researchframeworks.org/emherf/researchframework/v1/question/question-5de017794f4b6
Linked Strategy(s):
7A – Undertake syntheses of urban excavation, survey and documentary data to develop understanding of town development
More information:
Status:
Active
Authority to change status:
East Midlands Research Framework Steering Group
Date accepted:
Date of next review:

7.5.4: Can we shed further light upon the distribution and development of early churches or chapels and the origins and growth of the parish system?

More information on this question
URI:
https://researchframeworks.org/emherf/researchframework/v1/question/question-5de017794fdb0
Linked Strategy(s):
7I – Investigate the development of the open-field system and medieval woodland management
More information:
Status:
Active
Authority to change status:
East Midlands Research Framework Steering Group
Date accepted:
Date of next review:

7.5.5: How can we refine our understanding of local and regional architectural styles, including sculptured stonework, decorations and monuments?

More information on this question
URI:
https://researchframeworks.org/emherf/researchframework/v1/question/question-5de0177950517
Linked Strategy(s):
7A – Undertake syntheses of urban excavation, survey and documentary data to develop understanding of town development
More information:
Status:
Active
Authority to change status:
East Midlands Research Framework Steering Group
Date accepted:
Date of next review:

7.5.6: What may we deduce from scientific analyses of cemetery populations about changes in diet, mortality and other demographic variables, both within the region and between social groups?

More information on this question
URI:
https://researchframeworks.org/emherf/researchframework/v1/question/question-5de0177950d8a
Linked Strategy(s):
7C – Investigate the provisioning of the medieval town by further detailed study of environmental data and human remains
More information:
Status:
Active
Authority to change status:
East Midlands Research Framework Steering Group
Date accepted:
Date of next review:

7.6 Industry and trade

7.6.1: How and where was post-Conquest pottery manufactured and distributed, and what communication systems were employed?

More information on this question
URI:
https://researchframeworks.org/emherf/researchframework/v1/question/question-5de01779514ab
Linked Strategy(s):
7J – Research the regional communications infrastructure
More information:
Status:
Active
Authority to change status:
East Midlands Research Framework Steering Group
Date accepted:
Date of next review:

7.6.2: By what means were the extractive mineral industries controlled or organised by royal, monastic or lay lords?

More information on this question
URI:
https://researchframeworks.org/emherf/researchframework/v1/question/question-5de0177951c52
Linked Strategy(s):
7J – Research the regional communications infrastructure
More information:
Status:
Active
Authority to change status:
East Midlands Research Framework Steering Group
Date accepted:
Date of next review:

7.6.3: Can we identify, investigate and date sites associated with the region’s key extractive industries (especially iron, coal, lead and alabaster), the production and distribution of cloth and leather-work, and freshwater or marine fishing?

More information on this question
URI:
https://researchframeworks.org/emherf/researchframework/v1/question/question-5de017795373e
Linked Strategy(s):
7D – Investigate further the role of markets, fairs and ports and trading routes
More information:
Status:
Active
Authority to change status:
East Midlands Research Framework Steering Group
Date accepted:
Date of next review:

7.6.4: Can we develop a typological classification of buildings associated with medieval industrial and commercial activities and can we identify sub-regional and chronological patterning?

More information on this question
URI:
https://researchframeworks.org/emherf/researchframework/v1/question/question-5de0177953fbb
Linked Strategy(s):
7B – Enhance the record of urban and suburban secular standing buildings and associated subterranean structures
More information:
Status:
Active
Authority to change status:
East Midlands Research Framework Steering Group
Date accepted:
Date of next review:

7.7 The agrarian landscape and food-producing economy

7.7.1: Can we shed further light upon the origins and development of the open-field system and its impact upon agricultural practices?

More information on this question
URI:
https://researchframeworks.org/emherf/researchframework/v1/question/question-5de0177954634
Linked Strategy(s):
7I – Investigate the development of the open-field system and medieval woodland management
More information:
Status:
Active
Authority to change status:
East Midlands Research Framework Steering Group
Date accepted:
Date of next review:

7.7.2: Can we establish the character and extent of the field systems of non-champion landscapes (e.g. upland Derbyshire)?

More information on this question
URI:
https://researchframeworks.org/emherf/researchframework/v1/question/question-5de0177954e87
Linked Strategy(s):
7I – Investigate the development of the open-field system and medieval woodland management
More information:
Status:
Active
Authority to change status:
East Midlands Research Framework Steering Group
Date accepted:
Date of next review:

7.7.3: What can we deduce about changes in woodland management and animal or crop husbandry (including new crops, crop rotation, field systems, more intensive cultivation of clay soils and larger animals, particularly sheep)?

More information on this question
URI:
https://researchframeworks.org/emherf/researchframework/v1/question/question-5de0177955525
Linked Strategy(s):
7I – Investigate the development of the open-field system and medieval woodland management
More information:
Status:
Active
Authority to change status:
East Midlands Research Framework Steering Group
Date accepted:
Date of next review:

7.7.4: What can environmental remains teach us about diet and living conditions in urban, rural and coastal communities?

More information on this question
URI:
https://researchframeworks.org/emherf/researchframework/v1/question/question-5de0177955e0d
Linked Strategy(s):
7F – Investigate the development, structure and landholdings of manorial estate centres
More information:
Status:
Active
Authority to change status:
East Midlands Research Framework Steering Group
Date accepted:
Date of next review:

7.7.5: What may fish bones and other environmental data contribute to studies of the exploitation and distribution of freshwater and marine fish?

More information on this question
URI:
https://researchframeworks.org/emherf/researchframework/v1/question/question-5de0177956875
Linked Strategy(s):
7J – Research the regional communications infrastructure
More information:
Status:
Active
Authority to change status:
East Midlands Research Framework Steering Group
Date accepted:
Date of next review:

7.7.6: How best may we enhance study of the origins and development of early land reclamation and drainage, particularly in Lincolnshire?

More information on this question
URI:
https://researchframeworks.org/emherf/researchframework/v1/question/question-5de017795701f
More information:
Status:
Active
Authority to change status:
East Midlands Research Framework Steering Group
Date accepted:
Date of next review:

6 thoughts on "High Medieval"

  1. vowen2 vowen2 says:

    Organisation
    Trent & Peak Archaeology
    Site/Project Name
    Lenton Priory
    Parish
    Lenton
    County/Unitary Authority
    Nottingham City
    NGR
    SK 55151 38755
    HER No
    Awaiting deposition
    OASIS ID
    Trentpea1-20451
    Museum No
    To be finalised
    Report and Web Link
    B6_Abbey Street, Lenton, Archaeological Assessment Report and Updated Project Design
    Agenda Topic(s)

    7.1.4 Can we shed further light upon the commercial role of fairs, markets, ports and other trading centres (notably Boston)?
    Research Objective(s)

    7D Investigate further the role of markets, fairs and ports and trading routes
    How has this work addressed the Research Agenda and Strategy?

    The excavation of the site at Martinmas Fair, held at Lenton Priory, provided an opportunity to explore a rare example of a trading event which was conducted on the grounds of a monastic house under the authority of a religious order. The rich assemblage of material culture recovered during excavation may help to elucidate the differences between secular and ecclesiastical trading enterprises. Furthermore, the involvement of European merchants throughout the period of use of the fair raises the possibility that analysis may shed light upon changing international economic relationships during the High Medieval period. Analysis of the spatial organisation of the market may be able to inform us of how buildings and plot demarcations were structured and how individual plots may have varied depending upon the wealth, status and geopolitical provenance of the traders.

  2. vowen2 vowen2 says:

    Organisation
    Trent & Peak Archaeology
    Site/Project Name
    The Origins of Nottingham
    County/Unitary Authority
    Nottingham City
    Museum No
    NCMG 2013-3 to NCMG 2013-8
    Report and Web Link
    http://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/archives/view/nottingham_2014/
    Agenda Topic(s)

    7.1.1 How did the major towns and smaller market towns of the region develop after the Norman Conquest, both within the urban core and in suburban and extra-mural areas?
    7.1.2 Can we define more closely the industrial and trading activities associated with towns and the nature and extent of urban influence upon the countryside?
    Research Objective(s)

    7A Undertake syntheses of urban excavation, survey and documentary data to develop understanding of town development
    How has this work addressed the Research Agenda and Strategy?

    The Origins of Nottingham project has sought to disseminate more widely the results of unpublished sites excavated between 1969-80 in Nottingham City Centre. By reviewing the excavation evidence the project has been able to shed light on activity in both the pre-conquest and post-conquest urban centre. The post-conquest evidence was as follows:

    Boots Garage: Along Woolpack Lane a slight wattle and daub structure of 9th or 10th century date was recorded. This was replaced by successive timber buildings, followed by clearance in the 13th century for a malt kiln and associated cellar. These structures were overlain by buildings of the 12th or 13th centuries. Evidence of industrial activity in the period spanning the Norman Conquest was found in the form of a corn-drying kiln and smelting hearth, while later activity was indicated by a large 13th century bowl-shaped kiln/oven. These backlands appear to have been abandoned by c.1350.

    Halifax Place: Following evidence of early medieval settlement and industrial activity site was reorganised around 1100, with properties along at least two frontages and intense activity until c. 1350, including 8 corn-drying kilns, pits and an oven or kiln. A third frontage was occupied by buildings in the 13th century, preceding a phase of dereliction.

    Fisher Gate: In around 1000, a cobbled road was constructed joining Bellar Gate and Carter Gate. The road frontages were flanked by timber houses fronting plots containing pits, ovens and kilns. One such feature was a rock-cut, corn-drying kiln dating from c.1200 which had burnt down while in use. Clearance in c. 1300 retained the cobbled road joining Bellar Gate and Carter Gate, but the discovery of a range of new buildings suggests amalgamation into one property; these new buildings included a timber building with service wing, warehouses or workshops and a courtyard. The area was derelict from c.1350 until the 16th century.

    Woolpack Lane: Records indicate a major re-cut of the pre-Conquest defensive ditch in the first half of the 10th century. The ditch was again cut in the first half of the 12th century by another substantial ditch which was interpreted as part of the medieval defences that had enclosed both the pre-Conquest and Norman boroughs.

  3. vowen2 vowen2 says:

    Organisation
    MOLA Northampton
    Site/Project Name
    Project Angel
    Parish
    All Saints
    County/Unitary Authority
    Northamptonshire
    NGR
    SP 75501 60264
    HER No
    ENN107673
    OASIS ID
    molanort1-308684
    Agenda Topic(s)

    7.1.1 How did the major towns and smaller market towns of the region develop after the Norman Conquest, both within the urban core and in suburban and extra-mural areas?
    7.6.1 How and where was post-Conquest pottery manufactured and distributed, and what communication systems were employed?
    7.6.4 Can we develop a typological classification of buildings associated with medieval industrial and commercial activities and can we identify sub-regional and chronological patterning?
    How has this work addressed the Research Agenda and Strategy?

    The project is currently at Updated Project Design stage, and is a work in progress.

    The site lies in the Norman “New Borough” of Northampton and was preceded by early 12th-century ironstone quarrying. By the mid 12th century a carver¬タルs workshop stood on St John¬タルs Street from which domestic and craft waste was generated and umped into the quarry fill; its timber building was refurbished once and then replaced in stone by the mid 13th century.

    Malting and baking was undertaken adjacent during the late 12th and early 13th centuries; a stone building with a cobbled floor lay towards the centre of the frontage. Behind the building were four wells, a clay-lined tank for water and several ovens, including two bread ovens and three malting ovens. This activity ceased when the adjacent carver¬タルs workshop was replaced in stone and the whole frontage was cleared. Rear yard structures and ovens were demolished, wells were filled and the ground was levelled out.

    Subsequently, although there was still one building standing on St John¬タルs Street, the plots adjacent became a place for dumping soil, waste and cess. What started out as abandoned ground was gradually assimilated into a single plot, perhaps for gardens adjoining the late medieval tenement.

    Although this is not a pottery production site; it is the largest assemblage of medieval pottery ever recovered from Northampton. The assemblage contained a large number of imported wares, with continental imports from Germany and/or the Low Countries outnumbering those from East Anglia indicating direct continental trade with Northampton. The first definite finds of Spanish pottery were also identified and may have implications on the wealth and status of the household(s) involved. Further works have been defined by Paul Blinkhorn that will examine variations in the pottery assemblage from each of the frontage plots by period.

    The well-preserved malting activity comprised a large timber-lined tank and three malting ovens, together with several wells. The nature, infrastructure and layout of the site will add to the corpus of medieval industry in Northampton. There will be comparison of the excavated structures with others in the region.

  4. Jim Brown says:

    Problem with the format entry of apostaphes (also just testing the comment function)Reference

  5. Jim Brown says:

    A function to allow update and review (also correction of typos) would be appreciatedReference

  6. Organisation
    Oxford Archaeology North
    Site/Project Name
    Sadler Bridge Studios
    County/Unitary Authority
    Derby/Derby City Council
    NGR
    NGR SK 3510 3640
    HER No
    Awaiting deposition
    Museum No
    DBYMU 2012-285
    Report and Web Link
    Sadler Bridge Studios, Bold Lane, Derby: archaeological archive report (https://library.oxfordarchaeology.com/5844)
    Agenda Topics
    7.1.1 How did the major towns and smaller market towns of the region develop after the Norman Conquest, both within the urban core and in suburban and extra-mural areas?
    7.1.2 Can we define more closely the industrial and trading activities associated with towns and the nature and extent of urban influence on the countryside?
    7.6.1 How and where was post-Conquest pottery manufactured and distributed, and what communication systems were employed?
    7.6.4 Can we develop a typological classification of buildings associated with medieval industrial and commercial activities and can we identify sub-regional and chronological patterning?
    7.7.4 What can environmental remains teach us about diet and living conditions in urban, rural and coastal communities?
    7.7.5 What may fish bones and other environmental data contribute to studies of the exploitation and distribution of freshwater and marine fish?
    How has this work addressed the Research Agenda and Strategy?
    An important archaeological dataset was recovered during an archaeological evaluation and excavation at Sadler Bridge Studios, Derby, respectively completed in 2009 and 2013 by OA North, prior to redevelopment. Much of the data related to medieval urban activity occurring in the rear portions of two burgage plots extending from Sadler Gate, one of Derby’s important medieval thoroughfares. The excavated medieval remains included cess/refuse pits, timber buildings, fence-lines, and cultivation soils, dating to the twelfth-fourteenth centuries, and cess/refuse pits dating to the fifteenth/sixteenth century. These therefore provide details on the development of the medieval town, and also the types of small-scale buildings associated with later medieval urban industry, specifically iron production/working. Most of these features were associated with medieval pottery and other artefacts, providing information on post-Conquest pottery used by Derby’s medieval townspeople. Six cess/refuse pits were also extremely rich in palaeoenvironmental remains. These included plant remains and fish bones that provide details on the diet of those burgesses inhabiting Sadler Gate, and the exploitation of freshwater and marine fish.

Leave a Reply